﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>StrataFrame Forum » StrataFrame Application Framework - V1 » Issues  » Transactions &amp; Parent/Child objects.</title><generator>InstantForum 2017-1 Final</generator><description>StrataFrame Forum</description><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/</link><webMaster>StrataFrame Forum</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 20:46:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Transactions &amp; Parent/Child objects.</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost10984.aspx</link><description>I may be missing something, but saving objects with a parent child relationship under a transaction does seem to work properly. Attached is a simple example. It consists of one parent object with two child objects. When the three objects are saved outside of a transaction, everything works as expected. However when they are saved under a transaction, the framework saves the parent three times. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Larry</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:05:25 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Caylor</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Transactions &amp; Parent/Child objects.</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost19726.aspx</link><description>anything new on this???</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:05:25 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jason Seidell</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Transactions &amp; Parent/Child objects.</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost11062.aspx</link><description>I wouldn't go so far as to say degraded... you got to love TV shows where they blow up things:laugh:</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:28:28 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Caylor</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Transactions &amp; Parent/Child objects.</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost11049.aspx</link><description>Yes, it would... I think that thread &lt;EM&gt;was &lt;/EM&gt;overlooked... because by the time I saw it, it had degraded to talking about blowing up cement trucks and such :)&amp;nbsp; I'll let you know when I have a fix.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:23:47 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>StrataFrame Team</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Transactions &amp; Parent/Child objects.</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost11032.aspx</link><description>Tracking objects that have been saved but not comitted without using the IsDirty property would also fix the issue I mentioned in the following post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://forum.strataframe.net/Topic9625-10-1.aspx?Highlight=transaction"&gt;http://forum.strataframe.net/Topic9625-10-1.aspx?Highlight=transaction&lt;/A&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:46:51 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Larry Caylor</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Transactions &amp; Parent/Child objects.</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost11006.aspx</link><description>Yeah, it will do that... the business objects still return IsDirty = True until TransactionCommitt is called (just in case you roll back the transaction).&amp;nbsp; So, when the child checks its parent, it will still be dirty and will think it needs to save again.&amp;nbsp; Hrm... I'll have to think about this one;&amp;nbsp;might take me a little while.&amp;nbsp; I do have a collection of the DataTables that have participated in the transaction already, so&amp;nbsp;I can probably test on that.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:17:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>StrataFrame Team</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>