﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>StrataFrame Forum » StrataFrame Application Framework - V1 » Enhancement Requests  » Mobile Device Development</title><generator>InstantForum 2017-1 Final</generator><description>StrataFrame Forum</description><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/</link><webMaster>StrataFrame Forum</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:01:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Mobile Device Development</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost1496.aspx</link><description>Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if there are any plans to eventually add support for mobile devices/ .NET Compact Framework?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lance</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:48:50 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Lance Tofsrud</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Mobile Device Development</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost1502.aspx</link><description>Lance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Glad to help.&amp;nbsp; You are right about the limitations.&amp;nbsp; You have to spend a ton of time re-writing things because of the classes, properties, and methods that get "cut-out" of the compact framework.&amp;nbsp; I will let you know how things progress in the UMPC department though.&amp;nbsp; Talk to you soon.</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:48:50 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Trent L. Taylor</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Mobile Device Development</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost1500.aspx</link><description>Nothing to be sorry for; thanks for the response. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that any movement towards mobile development, regardless of towards a particular architecture (.NET Compact) or otherwise is a good thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your comment about moving towards the more powerful platform in UMPC is probably a better choice anyways. The .NET Compact Framework is a tad on the limiting side; especially in regards to controls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for the reply Trent.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:08:57 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Lance Tofsrud</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Mobile Device Development</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost1497.aspx</link><description>Lance,&lt;P&gt;As of right now, we are migrating towards the use of UMPC (Ultra-Mobile PCs).&amp;nbsp; The UMPCs support a full OS, but are extremely portable and have a lot more power.&amp;nbsp; Aside from that, you can develop on the full .NET framework.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have a Mobile PC application for our medical software.&amp;nbsp; It has been part of our medical system for around 5 years and has been one of the most frsutrating experiences we have ever encountered!&amp;nbsp; Microsoft and the PDA distributors, like Dell, seem to have major breakdowns in communication and Dell will discontinue a model and then overnight all of our users begin to experience "system meltdown."&amp;nbsp; This puts us in emergency mode getting that model of PDA in, finding and fixing the issue, and getting an update to the user.&amp;nbsp; This has happened counteless times over the five years.&amp;nbsp; Dell has issued a statement indicating that they may be getting out of the PDA business altogether.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of that being said, we currently do not have plans to extend the framework to the Compact Framework.&amp;nbsp; Obviously if the momentum of the industry begins to go back the other way we will revisit this issue.&amp;nbsp; But for now we plan on staying away from the compact framework.&lt;P&gt;Sorry :unsure:</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:16:46 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Trent L. Taylor</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>