﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>StrataFrame Forum » StrataFrame Application Framework - V1 » Issues  » Twitter vs. Email</title><generator>InstantForum 2017-1 Final</generator><description>StrataFrame Forum</description><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/</link><webMaster>StrataFrame Forum</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 05:27:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Twitter vs. Email</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost24331.aspx</link><description>I have tried Twitter, but I do not like it.  If you want to use Twitter, that is fine, but please do not replace your email updates with a 140-character blurb.  Twitter, in my opinion, belittles the content.  The name itself is a mockery of the potential content.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just because a technology is available does not mean we have to use it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:21:51 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Bill Cunnien</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Twitter vs. Email</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost24348.aspx</link><description>Wow....actually I guess that I never did make myself very clear.&amp;nbsp; First of all, we will not replace emails.&amp;nbsp; Second, I am not a personal fan of Twitter but we have been receiving a fair amount of pressure to&amp;nbsp;support Twitter, so it will just be another avenue, not a replacement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We prefer emails and RSS feeds to Twitter and Facebook no question.&amp;nbsp; But for those who know me, you may already have heard some of my Twitter rants (in regards to not being a fan), so this will in no way be a replacement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your comments as this definitely does tell me what the majority prefers.&amp;nbsp; Thanks! :D</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:21:51 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Trent L. Taylor</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Twitter vs. Email</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost24339.aspx</link><description>Afraid I have to agree. I would much prefer the non-twitter approach with a direct email (or forum posting) announcing new updates. I check the forums virtually daily but I can't see this happening with twitter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry about that but I guess I am too old&amp;nbsp;:)</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:37:55 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Aaron Young</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Twitter vs. Email</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost24337.aspx</link><description>I agree with Bill, please don't use Twitter (for that purpose). &lt;P&gt;Email is still the best solution to give precise details about features in releases.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:43:47 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Michel Levy</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Twitter vs. Email</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost24336.aspx</link><description>Down with Twitter.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:02:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Keith Chisarik</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Twitter vs. Email</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost24334.aspx</link><description>I Agreed with Bill.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I rather see more participation from StrataFrame team in these forums than trying to follow what is going on at many sites.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I was heavily used to MS OutLook Express (OE) and its newsgroups, and it took me a while to get used to web newsgroup, not that I am slow learner :hehe: but I liked the way newsgroup where organized in OE.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I understand the need to expand, but again, this is a different type of community which requires a lot of attention from the SF Team, and I would like to see more participation and quickest response in these forums to keep building a strong SF community.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:41:42 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Edhy Rijo</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>