﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>StrataFrame Forum » StrataFrame Application Framework - V1 » Enhancement Requests  » VB x C#</title><generator>InstantForum 2017-1 Final</generator><description>StrataFrame Forum</description><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/</link><webMaster>StrataFrame Forum</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:35:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>VB x C#</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost9607.aspx</link><description>I am programmer VB since the Basic of 1987, passing for the COBOL and Clipper. However, I had that to recognize that the C# surpassed my expectations. A really powerful syntax, constructed without commitment with the vices of the directed orientation the events. I want to also register my suggestion in the construction of SF framework with syntax C#, also adopting the concepts of programming of the language. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Alta Vista Translation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rogerio Mauri (From Brazil)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abraços.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:46:22 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Rogerio Mauri</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: VB x C#</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost9726.aspx</link><description>Ben... I reaffirm that it would be cautious to consider the C # in the future of the StrataFrame. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They forgive me if the translation of the Alta Vista is not giving the adequate interpretation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;;)</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:46:22 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Rogerio Mauri</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: VB x C#</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost9693.aspx</link><description>There are certainly merits to both languages.&amp;nbsp; Generally, the C# users are much more zealous in their support for C# than VB users are in their support for VB.&amp;nbsp; I can code faster in VB; however, I have run into a few places where&amp;nbsp;I had to write something in C# (such as the case where there is no op_implicit in VB [I know everyone says don't use it, but I got sick of writing CType over and over again and in specific cases it's the best way to go]).&amp;nbsp; With Option Strict, Option Explicit, DirectCast and&amp;nbsp;TryCast, there really isn't anything in your day to day stuff that VB can't do that C# can.&amp;nbsp; In 2003 that wasn't the case, but with 2005, you can even do things like custom events, and since we can type VB faster than C#, we use VB.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It generally comes down to personal preference (do you like curly-braces everywhere?).&amp;nbsp; 99% of users will never write anything sophisticated enough to choose the language based upon technical merit (such as yield return, op_implicit, anonymous methods, etc.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many users of VB also like the realtime compiler that tells you your errors as you go, though if you talk to a C# guy, he would consider that to be "babysitting."&amp;nbsp; According to MS, in .NET 3.5 with Orcas, C# is being geared to be the Class Library language, while VB will be the language of choice for UIs.&amp;nbsp; All personal preference.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:27:27 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>StrataFrame Team</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: VB x C#</title><link>http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost9666.aspx</link><description>&lt;SPAN id=ctl02_ctlTopic_ctlPanelBar_ctlTopicsRepeater_ctl03_lblPollQuestion&gt;Which .NET language do you prefer?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Vote for your favorite language:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://forum.strataframe.net/Topic797-18-1.aspx"&gt;http://forum.strataframe.net/Topic797-18-1.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rogério Mauri (From Brazil):D</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:26:10 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Rogerio Mauri</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>