What message error do you get when you build the partials from the BO Mapper?

Have you tried creating a brand new BO and buiding its partial to see if it works?

There is no error message when mapping. It maps the BO "correctly," creates its properties, methods correctly. The VS that displays the error, since the namespace of Bo does not match the same namespace design of Bo.

Yes, I tried to map part of both Business Objects both projects.

As I understand it, the design of class always takes the first available project he finds in BoMapper.

Example, in Bo Mapper:
-Project_01
     -boOne     -boTwo
     -boThree
Project_02
   -boFour
   -boOne
   -boFive

The namespace of boOne in Project_02 is "Project_02", but the namespace design of this class will be Project_01.

Recalling, that only occurs in Businnes Objects of the same name.   

Hiya. Have a look at this post:

http://forum.strataframe.net/FindPost27100.aspx

So, I guess my advice to you at this point would be to rename one of the BOs.

Ivan Thanks for the tip, but in SF 1.6.6 I had this feature. The same BO in two different projects.

Any chance of maintaining this compatibility?

Hi Malcon.

I have a feeling this has been this way all the time, but since you had it working before I really don't know what could have happened. I will forward this to the guys, but I think your best bet at the moment would be to name them differently and carry on.

Malcon,

It still works as you can have the same BO name in two different namespaces.  The issue is not as much the different assemblies, but namespaces.  Make sure that your namespaces are correct as this would just be a standard .NET related issue as you cannot have to identically named classes occupy the same namespace unless they are partial to each other, in which this case they would not be.

I would be more than happy to look at this, but in these cases, if you could create a simple app that reproduces the scenario, then I can look at your configuration to see what the issue is.  Sometimes screenshots and forum posts don't give us that "ah-hah" moment since it would something else in the mix.

Thanks!