1.61 Source Code


Author
Message
Paul Chase
Paul Chase
Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 414, Visits: 2.8K
Is the source code posted in the downloads correct ?

The version still says 1.6.0.0

I have to recompile the dev ex wrapper to get the Dev Ex version to match what I'm using and just want to make sure I'm not going to end with down level code.

Thanks

Trent Taylor
Trent Taylor
StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)
Group: StrataFrame Developers
Posts: 6.6K, Visits: 6.9K
If you are referring to the downloads section, it says 1.6.1. 

If you are referring to the assembly version when you compile or open it up, then yes, it still says 1.6.0.  We did this intentionally to reduce the number of problems people have upgrading when the version changes. 

In short, yes, the source in the downloads section is up to date. Smile

Paul Chase
Paul Chase
Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 414, Visits: 2.8K
Thanks Trent

I was referring to the assembly version Smile

I thought that you mentioned leaving the assembly version the same and I assumed that was the case but you know what they say about assumptions. Wink

P

Trent Taylor
Trent Taylor
StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (10K reputation)
Group: StrataFrame Developers
Posts: 6.6K, Visits: 6.9K
Yeah....I am usually on the first part of the word rather than "umption" if you catch my meaning BigGrin  Glad you asked Smile
Paul Chase
Paul Chase
Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (580 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 414, Visits: 2.8K
Lol, I'm with you!!.... Last weekend I went SwordFishing, I assumed that my father had fueled the boat up. we get 20 miles offshore and get tangled up in a nasty thunderstorm and once again I found out the true meaning off assumption!! Smile 


GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search