DDT Error - Running Deployment Package Wizard


Author
Message
Tim Dol
Tim Dol
Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 340, Visits: 1.4K
I haven't had to run this in a while but I need to add the security tables to my package but I get the attached error when I click on Deployment Package Wizard.

Thanks

Tim

Attachments
DDTError.png (161 views, 50.00 KB)
StrataFrame Team
S
StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)
Group: StrataFrame Developers
Posts: 3K, Visits: 2.5K
Ah, that problem is because we changed the name of the ItemCollection property, it was ItemColletion (missing c) and when you downloaded the new SF DLLs from the website, you also need the new DDT .exe that is built on those DLLs, so, here ya go:
Attachments
DDT.zip (133 views, 821.00 KB)
Charles R Hankey
Charles R Hankey
StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)StrataFrame VIP (1.3K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 524, Visits: 30K
Just a suggestion: these fixes seem to get posted in reply to messages on kind of an ad hoc basis.  I think it would be helpful if a reference were posted in the latest posted releases section so everyone would know the current exes and dlls and could keep in sync in case they miss the thread where the fix is offered.

Smile

Tim Dol
Tim Dol
Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (666 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 340, Visits: 1.4K
Thanks. Doesn the DDT rely on the SF version? I haven't upgraded to 1.61 yet.

Tim

StrataFrame Team
S
StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)
Group: StrataFrame Developers
Posts: 3K, Visits: 2.5K
Yes, we have the updates thread that "StrataFrame Developers" are allowed to post to, but we're pretty bad about keeping it up to date.  I, personally, am pretty lazy when it comes to updating it and just kinda post the fix directly thread in question.  I'll discuss it with the team about posting to the updates thread and creating some sort of system on how to list the changes made to the thread in addition to the fix, also what we'll need to include in each update post's attachments.
StrataFrame Team
S
StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (6.5K reputation)
Group: StrataFrame Developers
Posts: 3K, Visits: 2.5K
Oh, Tim, yeah that relies on the 1.6.1 update.  But, the DLLs are the same version number as the ones that you have, so unless you get a MissingMethodException or something, you can just run with the SF version that you have.  I don't think any existing stuff in SF has been changed that would change the meta-data that is compiled into the DDT, so it should run fine.
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search