StrataFrame Forum
Back
Login
Login
Home
»
StrataFrame Application Framework - V1
»
WinForms (How do I?)
»
StrataListView performance VS SF Listview
StrataListView performance VS SF Listview
Post Reply
Like
0
StrataListView performance VS SF Listview
View
Flat Ascending
Flat Descending
Threaded
Options
Subscribe to topic
Print This Topic
RSS Feed
Goto Topics Forum
Author
Message
Edhy Rijo
E
Edhy Rijo
posted 14 Years Ago
ANSWER
Topic Details
Share Topic
E
Group: StrataFrame Users
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 23K
Does the new StrataListView in StrataFrame Expanded libary performs better when loading 1,000+ records than the standard SF ListView?
I have couple of forms in which the user requested to show all records in grid or view, since I have more control with the SF ListView I am using that, but performance is very slow when compared to a GridView, so I wonder if the new StrataListView will perform better?
Edhy Rijo
Reply
Like
0
Keith Chisarik
Keith Chisarik
posted 14 Years Ago
ANSWER
Post Details
Share Post
Group: StrataFrame Users
Posts: 939,
Visits: 40K
I cant wait to see if it databinds
Keith Chisarik
Sigma Data Systems
Reply
Like
0
Trent Taylor
Trent Taylor
posted 14 Years Ago
ANSWER
Post Details
Share Post
Group: StrataFrame Developers
Posts: 6.6K,
Visits: 6.9K
Edhy:
I have some screens that I load tens of thousands of records into it and it is fast. The reason is that it renders virtually without any configuration or coding on your part. This has become a staple control in MicroFour development by all internal coders, and it has worked really well and is extremely versatile! I have one app that has two and updates on threads and has progress bars in one column and massive amounts of data being dumped into another as a log. So I know it can handle high volume and perform fast. The difference is that the standard ListView doesn't virtualize by default and requires some additional coding to make it happen, and even still, it doesn't render perform as fast. Most likely due to the underlying API hooks that are in place by default.
Keith:
I know that this has been a long time coming on the data binding, and I have started it several times, but we have waited to make sure that there are no new features that would impact this. I believe at this point it is safe and so this is already on the short list....and is something that I have wanted numerous times as well...which helps the ranking in the queue
Reply
Like
0
Edhy Rijo
E
Edhy Rijo
posted 14 Years Ago
ANSWER
Post Details
Share Post
E
Group: StrataFrame Users
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 23K
Hi Trent,
Great, that is what I was expected to hear. I need this functionality in at least 4 forms, so manually binding won't be so hard, I will check the sample you posted a while ago to start up replacing the standard SF ListView with StrataListView.
Edhy Rijo
Reply
Like
0
Edhy Rijo
E
Edhy Rijo
posted 14 Years Ago
ANSWER
Post Details
Share Post
E
Group: StrataFrame Users
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 23K
Wowwww, this is a moment to celebrate!!!! Good news and some not so good.
Good News:
Preliminary test results of the new StrataListview vs old SF ListView:
Number of Records loaded:
1,941
Number of Columns created: 2
Time to load records:
SF Old ListView: 43.07 seconds
New StrataListView: 0.03 seconds
Actually this is an Excellent news!
No so Good News:
You guys have to work faster and complete the automation features of this StrataListView and retire the old good SF Listview
Thanks guys!!!
Edhy Rijo
Reply
Like
0
GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...
Merge into merge target...
Merge into a specific topic ID...
Open Merge
Post Reply
Like
0
Similar Topics
Post Quoted Reply
Reading This Topic
Login
Login
Remember Me
Reset Password
Resend Validation Email
Login
Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search