Documentation


Author
Message
Pertti Karjalainen
Pertti Karjalainen
StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (54 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 54, Visits: 4K
1. I've said this before in another post, but just to keep the point alive: would be really nice to have C# equivelant code where-ever VB.NET code is shown in the documentation.  This makes it much easier to get a handle on the development, since you can just copy and paste code as you are learning the system rather than hand-typing and generating all kinds of dumb typos...

2. Tutorials could use a bit more sprucing up.  For example, it is assumed that a person following the tutorial follows certain naming convention (e.g., txtMyField or cmdMyButton).  I'm used to this from my VFP background, but brand new users may find it a bit hard to follow the tutorials when they name controls something else than is expected, and then the compiler throws all kinds of errors.

3. Would be nice to have a complete class library reference addendum in the end of the documentation.  This way users could quickly look up and learn about any and all SF controls.

That's it for starters.  Maybe others want to pipe in here.  I think the documentation over all is quite good, but it would certainly benefit from a few additional features. 

Speaking of which, do the training videos morph with the program as new things are added and old things changed?  If one buys the video(s), does one get free/discounted updates as the videos are updated to reflect the current state of affairs?

Thanks!

Pertti

GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search