Slight problem on recompile of Security Project


Author
Message
Charles Thomas Blankenship...
Charles Thomas Blankenship
Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (708 reputation)
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 172, Visits: 12K
The post build events specify that the location of the AfterBuild.bat file is located in the parent subdirectory vice the Security subdirectory. Moving the file to the security subdirectory "fixes" the "problem". However, I have a feeling that I wasn't rebuilding the Security project properly.



So, my question is this. When a change is made to, oh let's say the SFUserBO, and all I need to rebuild is the Security Project, how do I go about doing that ... from the MicroFour StrataFrame Security.sln file located in the MicroFour StrataFrame Security subdirectory of the MicroFour StrataFrame Security.sln located in the StrataFrame Source Code subdirectory ... I'm betting it is the latter.



This also begs the question ... why have two solution files, one in a parent and one in a subdirectory?



Thanks guys,



CT

Charles T. Blankenship
Senior Consultant
Novant Consulting, Inc.
704.975.7152
http://www.novantconsulting.com
Trent Taylor
Trent Taylor
StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)StrataFrame Developer (14K reputation)
Group: StrataFrame Developers
Posts: 6.6K, Visits: 7K
If you want to rebuild the security, go through the MicroFour StrataFrame Security.sln file.  The reasons they are not in the same solution is because they are two different products.  Though one relies on the other (Security on Framework) they do not both have to be purchased.  Thus, we do not want to give out the security source code if someone has not purchased it.  It would not be worth the energy to recreate all of the source solutions in more than one format as this could potentially introduce different behavior in the field, which would not be good Smile
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search