My Wishlist


Author
Message
Kevin Lingofelter
Kevin Lingofelter
StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)StrataFrame Novice (77 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77, Visits: 804
Greetings!

I am going to be posting some of my wishlist for Strata. Some of my ideas are pretty long winded, so I thought I should create a post for each one.

Better security support
I would like to see role based security implemented in the layers:

Framework
1. A global object which identifies the curernt user. This identity would include username, roles collection and whether or not the user has been authenticated. It would also include methods which allow the username, password and roles collection to be modified. Another handy utility would be a function which is passed a role as an argument and it returns true if the user is in that role.
2. A User/Role editor which can be used by the programmer in their applications. These are pretty standard and would fit nicely with some of the existing SF forms already in use. Of course, the programmer can use their own form to manage uers and roles.

UI
A RequiredRole collection for Strata UI components which is bound to a specified property which can be bound to a certain property, for example the read-only state, visibility, enabled, etc. Before a control is rendered, it checks to see if the user is in the declared role(s). If not the control's property is toggled accordingly. Forms can also respond to the RequiredRoles collection by either throwing an exception or displaying the login form, etc.

Imagine this scerio:

txtSellingPrice
  RequiredRoles = {"Manager", "Owner"}
  BoundProperty = ReadOnly

If the user logged in is only a member of SalesClerk, the selling price would be readonly. If Manager and Owner, then the textbox would be editable. In the change event, I could then allow the changes to be limited by role. For example, if Manager is logged in, allow price to be changed up to 3%, the Owner can change it to whatever he/she likes.

This would allow for a more declaritive security model. If the existing secuirty model is extended to utilize roles, the programmer can also have "low level" security hooks to do whatever they wanted.

Thoughts?

GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
Kevin Lingofelter - 18 Years Ago
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
Kevin Lingofelter - 18 Years Ago
StrataFrame Team - 18 Years Ago
Larry Caylor - 18 Years Ago
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
Larry Caylor - 18 Years Ago
StrataFrame Team - 18 Years Ago
StrataFrame Team - 18 Years Ago
                     Looking forward to these enhancements as well.

One more...
Randy Jean - 18 Years Ago
                         Tying the security into the menu system is certainly a large...
StrataFrame Team - 18 Years Ago
                             OK, doesn't sound like it should a big deal to do in code, especially...
Randy Jean - 18 Years Ago
                                 The new release will be made available on September 22, 2006. The...
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
                                     How much will this addon cost? Also, not to sound cheap or anything,...
Randy Jean - 18 Years Ago
                                         The Role-Based security add-on is $295 per developer. As for being...
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
                                             Hi, "The new release will be made available on September 22, 2006."...
Kari Paukku - 18 Years Ago
                                                 Looks like the Volume 1 of the StrataTrain E-Reference will be...
StrataFrame Team - 18 Years Ago
                                             Trent,
Yes, this answers my questions. Thanks. Again, meant no...
Randy Jean - 18 Years Ago
                                                 No offense was taken, I just wanted to make sure you understood why we...
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
Kevin Lingofelter - 18 Years Ago
StrataFrame Team - 18 Years Ago
Kevin Lingofelter - 18 Years Ago
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
     Perfect!
Kevin Lingofelter - 18 Years Ago
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
Wayne Van Rooyen - 18 Years Ago
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
StrataFrame Team - 18 Years Ago
Kari Paukku - 18 Years Ago
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
Kari Paukku - 18 Years Ago
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago
Larry Caylor - 18 Years Ago
             Yes. This is the goal. :D
Trent L. Taylor - 18 Years Ago

Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search