Evaluating strataframe and have some questions


Author
Message
Brian Bakkebo
Brian Bakkebo
StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)StrataFrame Beginner (7 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 5
Hello, I am evaulating strataframework and have some questions.



We have been doing a lot with dynamic building of forms and building of field generation based on database and I came across strataframe. But I wanted to know if anyone had experience with doing this in Strataframe and perhaps if they could also provide how they did it.



The areas that we are looking at are these.

1) support automatically generated forms for editing an object. So basically here if we add a field to the table we want the form to automatically pick it up. It appears with strataframe today we have to update the bo and then update the form. We would like to update the bo and then in the form interface we are painting the screen with the fields. it should be no need for the developer to create an edit/new form at all. Basically, it should be all done in the base class. if it's just a couple of clicks to create the edit/new form then it's not a big deal

2) support for dynamic attributes. Meaning creating dynamic fields in forms which will be added to a db table automatically and then these fields will be able to be implemented into the forms.

3) support of our existing datalayer created with mygeneration.



#3 is more of an issue with how will we deal with our existing data structures if we moved to strataframe.

Thanks
Reply
Aaron Young
Aaron Young
Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)Advanced StrataFrame User (569 reputation)
Group: StrataFrame Users
Posts: 277, Visits: 1.1K
Sorry for jumping in but I have justed moved to StrataFrame from another system which did automatically generate a user interface (albeit by a painful process). The first thing we did was ditch it and write our own interface as the generated UI was appalling.

I agree with Trent. I don't ever see a generated interface working for anything other than a small application and it would never look as good as one crafted by hand.

Even if StrataFrame offered this feature tomorrow I would never use it. For the record, creating forms in SF is really sweet! The whole process from adding a new field in BO through to the form is not a big deal. It is REALLY a clean process. I am still learning SF but I can do things in it much faster than in my previous system - in fact the previous system is in the bin and will NEVER be used again.

Many systems say great things on their websites. StrataFrame does exactly what they say in a very clean and efficient way which is not the same as some of the others on the market.

Just my two cents worth.

GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search